Faster Processing

Moderator: TGN

Post Reply
User avatar
ghost bazz
Member
Posts: 1485
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Tacompton
Contact:

Faster Processing

Post by ghost bazz »

I've been working off a 16 MB card lately so I've been sampling straight mono. Used to capture the main track in stereo, then selectively resample things down to mono, but the smaller card runs out of space quick when you sample a whole track in stereo. So... from there, all my individual chops and resampling go as long-play mono. I've noticed that working with the smaller card & smaller file size on chops and resampling has drastically increased the processing speed. So it's a bit of a trade off, but not really a big deal if your sound is grimy to begin with. Faster 505 processing time! Yes! :lol:
User avatar
fauna
505 Award Winner '09
Posts: 1692
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Location: montreal

Post by fauna »

yeah, that's exactly what i thought. i posted somewhere in here about how the "system" processes much faster than anything from the pad banks or sequences, and when I shifted to the larger card (up to a 128 from 16) everything slowed down. i think it just scans the card before each process, and that's what causes the delay.

the smaller samples, etc., makes sense too.
User avatar
Olerud
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: Denver
Contact:

Post by Olerud »

Yeah I think my 32mb card makes my 303 much faster than my 64. I thought it was cuz the card was fucked but this makes sense!
Post Reply