Hot Sauce wrote:honest question here.
why did you have to insert a rolling eyes emoticon as it is rather condescending. i was just asking you a genuine question, are you a fan of hip-hop. i was just curious. artists like flying lotus are considered to be hip-hop. is that good enough for you?
cause its attack ad hominem, i must not know what im talking about cause im not hip hop
if thats not the case , i am truly sorry.
i don't mind have discussions online but when they resort to pettiness it gets quite annoying. we both have differing opinions on the matter, whatever that matter is i'm not exactly sure of because i don't know what point you're trying to get across.
are you saying that you don't know what hip-hop is anymore?
or that the very term "hip-hop" is constricting?
or that the genre itself lacks innovation?
sorry im not trying to offend or condescend.. but people get touchy about their genres.
i think you are focusing in on individual things rather than getting the big picture. the whole genre is in disarray , and the whole concept of working in specific genres is failing to create good music as of lately...
but like i said, Brainfeeder is doing the righteous work of progress...they don't discriminate against music because it doesn't fit an image like the majority of hip hop labels would do, this is the important part, in the US
from my point of view i still have a clear view of what is hip-hop.
i personally don't find the genre of hip-hop to be confining at all because it can be so versatile if it wants to be. remember hip-hop doesn't always need an MC.
truth
see what im arguing isn't that i don't think hip hop is innovating, its that when it does innovate
close minded people won't take notice of it as hip hop because of the new mentality it has.
If its no longer "get paid get laid" and its more like "open your fuckin mind" with more spiritual connotations then i truly think that the hip hop culture will reject it in the US for their mindless exaggerations of minimal success and money.
you are confusing that to mean that I am saying its not innovating, no thats not the case at all
im trying to take the stance of the naysayer so to speak, although it is not my position
and on wheter the genre is innovating. i believe innovation is always happening. wheter or not we are aware of it is a different story. unfortunately some things are created in such a way that they can only evolve so far until they become something else. it is still not clear as to wheter or not that is the case with hip-hop. although it stands more of a chance than other electronic genres as it isn't as dancefloor orientated.
and whether we are aware of it depends on the labels notice of someones ability to gather an audience or tap into an existing one
brainfeeder is taking aim at the psychedelic crowd, not the hip hop one, though they do overlap because true hip hop fans know whats up

.
genres restrict artists...
for an example outside of hip hop and dance and other sometimes goal oriented music
when squarepusher, aphex twin, and venetian snares sat down to make music
none of them had a goal besides pleasing their own ears, none of them called themselves dnb or idm or edm or whatever, they just pushed their sound to the very limit of their ability
this attitude is very hard to find in hip hop nowadays, people get to a point and stop, or decide to produce quantity instead of a deeper sound
do you think that afrikaa bambattaa gave two shits if people thought he was hip hop or not? he just pushed it to the limit of his imagination
so then it comes to:
"not everyone can be an innovator or creative genius"
creativity or musical "genius" is absolutely irrelevant if you just stop trying to please anybody but yourself...pleasing innovative music WILL result regardless of your creativity with throwing standards out the window
its like painters in the middle ages, for centuries they did work commissioned for the church, and it was bland and not very expressive because they did it solely for the money. there was no expression in these portraits of kings, popes, violent scenes, etc. and they always had the same rigid guidlines as using RED as a focal point.
t
hat doesn't mean that artists during the middle ages weren't producing amazing material, but to history they are non-existant because they had no one to appreciate their work.
so please don't think im angry or anything, debate is one of my favorite things to do, and i get carried away, but we agree more than you think, just that we are perceiving different things. also a factor may be that you can view the US hip hop without any preconceptions of who listens to it, the scene, the fans, the image, etc and just appreciate it for what it is. which is something you should be thankful for
