Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Talk the talk.

Moderator: TGN

User avatar
dollarllama d
Member
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:33 pm

Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by dollarllama d »

I remember when labels used to build the artist career up or just school them somewhat , but they had some talent to work with to begin with. Now whatever gimmick and youtube views is all need. Now this is comedy that girl kreayshawn could only sale under 4000 albums with a million dollar advance, and crazy radio plays which label pays for. total machine backing to only do them numbers. smh !!! I wonder if anyone on these forums was one of the few who bought that album. If so I got jokes for you. lmao >>> http://hiphopandpolitics.wordpress.com/ ... low-sales/
knobsmcgee
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:09 am

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by knobsmcgee »

she didnt have total backing. she probably pissed off some big wigs.

lowest first wk sales ever for a major label artist lol
Toraiz SP-16, SP-606, SP-505, Kaossilator KO2
User avatar
dollarllama d
Member
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:33 pm

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by dollarllama d »

knobsmcgee wrote:she didnt have total backing. she probably pissed off some big wigs.

lowest first wk sales ever for a major label artist lol


maybe not total backing but million dollar budget is alot of backing to flop like that.lol even nas didnt get that kinda bread when he was on columbia .
User avatar
riPaddo
Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 10:41 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by riPaddo »

Never heard of the song or artist... Great article though, makes me feel a little bit better that not any gimmick can make it.
PEEPOL PERSUNN
New member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:33 am

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by PEEPOL PERSUNN »

i bought that. 4.5/5 mics
User avatar
Mr.Plasmawisp
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:33 am

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by Mr.Plasmawisp »

=D =D =D
User avatar
teamdiscoverychannel
Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:01 pm
Location: UK UK UK

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by teamdiscoverychannel »

:lol: :lol: :lol: Every record label sucks dick!!
303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.303.
User avatar
cartesia
Member
Posts: 2305
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:37 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by cartesia »

the majors, at least.

The thing is 95% of the time their gimmicks do pay off, so theyre still financially winning
Samples.
User avatar
dollarllama d
Member
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:33 pm

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by dollarllama d »

cartesia wrote:the majors, at least.

The thing is 95% of the time their gimmicks do pay off, so theyre still financially winning


payoff for label not the artist. because label is pretty much like a bank giving out loan. im sure u know that. pay off for artist is gettin on tours pretty much nowadays.
User avatar
skinny.b
Member
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:35 pm
Location: Maidstone UK

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by skinny.b »

awesome article man, interesting shit
Texta
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 8:46 am

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by Texta »

---
Last edited by Texta on Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aquarius
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by aquarius »

some good points dollarllama d.

The thing is like you say, the hype is built up over you- tube hits....How many people who watch you-tube videos are actually willing to go out and buy an album when they can listen to it for free online?

The labels are probably happy with the fact that millions of hits generate mega advertising...which keeps the suits happy.

As far as the artist is concerned its all about self promotion which probably explains why so many bands tour like crazy....I know its not hip hop but look at rock bands like Motorhead...All they do is tour and make albums....I wonder which one they make more money off?

Peace!
User avatar
roygbivs
Member
Posts: 261
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 7:31 pm
Location: 919
Contact:

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by roygbivs »

aquarius wrote:some good points dollarllama d.

The thing is like you say, the hype is built up over you- tube hits....How many people who watch you-tube videos are actually willing to go out and buy an album when they can listen to it for free online?

The labels are probably happy with the fact that millions of hits generate mega advertising...which keeps the suits happy.

As far as the artist is concerned its all about self promotion which probably explains why so many bands tour like crazy....I know its not hip hop but look at rock bands like Motorhead...All they do is tour and make albums....I wonder which one they make more money off?

Peace!

Touring
SP 404 OG
in haze
Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:16 am

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by in haze »

-
Last edited by in haze on Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fruits
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:26 am

Re: Gimmicks vs. Raw Talent

Post by fruits »

dollarllama d wrote:
cartesia wrote:the majors, at least.

The thing is 95% of the time their gimmicks do pay off, so theyre still financially winning


payoff for label not the artist. because label is pretty much like a bank giving out loan. im sure u know that. pay off for artist is gettin on tours pretty much nowadays.


agreed, if anyone had this mentality..
thing is most people dont pay for their music unfortunately.
It is now way too easy to DL anything you want.
http://www.fruits.bandcamp.com - 16 Free EPs <Raw 8-bit>
[url]www.http://soundcloud.com/fru1ts[/url] - All Downloadable

Raw Avant-garde.
Post Reply