would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Talk the talk.

Moderator: TGN

Post Reply
User avatar
p o n t u s
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:27 am

would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by p o n t u s »

topic :D

303 with djfx looper or a 404 with external resampling
User avatar
Rabot
Member
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by Rabot »

shiittt.huhhh

404sx with resamp.
Nothingless1987
Member
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:05 pm
Location: live from spectrum, Gloucester.

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by Nothingless1987 »

definatly 404 with ext resample
User avatar
admbmb
Member
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:06 pm
Contact:

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by admbmb »

303 is great, but slowwww.
User avatar
kel
Winner of Bronze Medal
Winner of Bronze Medal
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:26 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by kel »

gotta have the speed of the 404
User avatar
yo-yo crunch
Member
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:49 pm

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by yo-yo crunch »

no brainer--404 with external resample. djfx and bpm looper are cool but i could easily live without them.
honestly i'm cool without the external resampling since you can just sample your external bass or synth notes to the pads and do it that way. there seems to be a workaround for nearly everything
User avatar
kel
Winner of Bronze Medal
Winner of Bronze Medal
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:26 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by kel »

If i didn't have djfx I would need REAL PITCH!!!!
tape smoke
Funniest Member of the Year '09
Posts: 1877
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:06 am

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by tape smoke »

the other day my 404 bugged out hardcore, and all the samples speeded up x20, so i am convinced it has sample rate pitching , this happened to me right after i pitched a sample in my sample trak and bounced it back into the 404. now my memory card only works when i put it in a few times after turning it on, never works with the card in place when i turn it on
I/O - EHT - Evangelist.
User avatar
springwater
Member
Posts: 1343
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:28 pm
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by springwater »

external resample is the shit. Dumbest thing they could do was to turn it off. I sometimes forget going from an older 808 which has 2 inputs and can record whatever, even record from the 4 track to the pads. Then i use my 404 and im like "oh, forgot" it hinders my set up so much that i only use it as an effects send/return which is pretty dope and i might record a snippet of something that im sending out from my multitrack and fuck with it more before i return it. But the external record during resampling should be standard. Had it in the 808 and the 303, said fuck the 404 and brought it back in the 555. Them dudes at roland gotta be on dog food.
User avatar
KRYMESPREE
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:07 am

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by KRYMESPREE »

How about a 404 that could apply multiple effects or at least different effects on multiple pads
Krisso The Great
Member
Posts: 588
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:37 am

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by Krisso The Great »

real pitch would be a nice addition,

the pitch on 404 is pretty much half of my production technique if i'm honest

8)
@krissothegreat

Live life . Love life
iloveclams
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:55 am

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by iloveclams »

kel wrote:If i didn't have djfx I would need REAL PITCH!!!!


yeah its weird how when they went from 202 to 303 they took away the nice pitch effect they had and made it shittier. and the mic..
THEY R CRAZY
User avatar
squ!L
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:24 am
Contact:

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by squ!L »

i would trade vinyl sim for panning. or maybe not. but i think every instrument should have djfx:)
User avatar
sleepy eyes
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 4:14 am
Location: southern ca
Contact:

Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam

Post by sleepy eyes »

303 with subsonic would be nice, also if it ran on sd cards instead of smartmedia. I've gotten used to the work around for the ext resample i don't even use it.
Post Reply