303 with djfx looper or a 404 with external resampling
would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
Moderator: TGN
- p o n t u s
- Member
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:27 am
would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
topic
303 with djfx looper or a 404 with external resampling
303 with djfx looper or a 404 with external resampling
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
shiittt.huhhh
404sx with resamp.
404sx with resamp.
-
Nothingless1987
- Member
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:05 pm
- Location: live from spectrum, Gloucester.
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
definatly 404 with ext resample
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
303 is great, but slowwww.
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
gotta have the speed of the 404
- yo-yo crunch
- Member
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:49 pm
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
no brainer--404 with external resample. djfx and bpm looper are cool but i could easily live without them.
honestly i'm cool without the external resampling since you can just sample your external bass or synth notes to the pads and do it that way. there seems to be a workaround for nearly everything
honestly i'm cool without the external resampling since you can just sample your external bass or synth notes to the pads and do it that way. there seems to be a workaround for nearly everything
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
If i didn't have djfx I would need REAL PITCH!!!!
-
tape smoke
- Funniest Member of the Year '09
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:06 am
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
the other day my 404 bugged out hardcore, and all the samples speeded up x20, so i am convinced it has sample rate pitching , this happened to me right after i pitched a sample in my sample trak and bounced it back into the 404. now my memory card only works when i put it in a few times after turning it on, never works with the card in place when i turn it on
I/O - EHT - Evangelist.
- springwater
- Member
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:28 pm
- Location: Oakland, CA
- Contact:
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
external resample is the shit. Dumbest thing they could do was to turn it off. I sometimes forget going from an older 808 which has 2 inputs and can record whatever, even record from the 4 track to the pads. Then i use my 404 and im like "oh, forgot" it hinders my set up so much that i only use it as an effects send/return which is pretty dope and i might record a snippet of something that im sending out from my multitrack and fuck with it more before i return it. But the external record during resampling should be standard. Had it in the 808 and the 303, said fuck the 404 and brought it back in the 555. Them dudes at roland gotta be on dog food.
- KRYMESPREE
- Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:07 am
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
How about a 404 that could apply multiple effects or at least different effects on multiple pads
-
Krisso The Great
- Member
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:37 am
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
real pitch would be a nice addition,
the pitch on 404 is pretty much half of my production technique if i'm honest

the pitch on 404 is pretty much half of my production technique if i'm honest
@krissothegreat
Live life . Love life
Live life . Love life
-
iloveclams
- Member
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:55 am
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
kel wrote:If i didn't have djfx I would need REAL PITCH!!!!
yeah its weird how when they went from 202 to 303 they took away the nice pitch effect they had and made it shittier. and the mic..
THEY R CRAZY
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
i would trade vinyl sim for panning. or maybe not. but i think every instrument should have djfx:)
- sleepy eyes
- Member
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 4:14 am
- Location: southern ca
- Contact:
Re: would you rather there be a 303w/djfx looper or 404w/exresam
303 with subsonic would be nice, also if it ran on sd cards instead of smartmedia. I've gotten used to the work around for the ext resample i don't even use it.


