a.D. wrote:i'd just get that keyboard mpd with the 8-12 pads or whatever..that shit looks dope,its like an asr and mpc in one.
That's what I'm sayin'. M-Audio Axiom 25
Moderator: TGN
a.D. wrote:i'd just get that keyboard mpd with the 8-12 pads or whatever..that shit looks dope,its like an asr and mpc in one.
KOMSAT wrote:a.D. wrote:or sampletrak at 16 kHz sampled at 45 rpm then ptched down...or just sampled at 16 regularly then pitched at least 2-3 levels either higher or lower really,sampling at 45 isn't even neccessarry unless u want shit extra grainy..much simpler.ST!
Yeah seriously, there's like 99 ways to get grain into your sound, plugins aren't the answer.IIIII wrote:seems weird to me to buy new, high end equipment to obtain older, lo-fi sounds.
+1. Don't fake the funk. I'm not going to lie, I love me some Vinyl Sim and the like but the concept/name kind of seems like pandering. There's countless plugins from low end to high high end (Neve/SSL/Manley) that emulate gear. Man why would I want to emulate something physical that already exists, you're a computer, you should be able to make sounds that are transdimensional. New sound!
All that said, I still think the Maschine is a bastion of things to come as far as beatmaking. If all my gear got destroyed in a tornado/earthquake/zombie attack I think I'd seriously consider the Maschine, but if you've got a way of working already I don't see it offering much more in the way of features or workflow. One to watch though.
Coincidentally it's on sale at a store near me here in the UK today. Hmm...
dollarllama d wrote:fakin the funk ??? its just an option everybody cant use an sp 1200 . its way easier to get plugins nowadays and learn it impose to buying a vintage drum machine. either one is dope. old hardware does breakdown and cost to repair and its a mission finding disk for them. but i wouldnt suggest a maschine if u have alot of equipment already.
KOMSAT wrote:dollarllama d wrote:fakin the funk ??? its just an option everybody cant use an sp 1200 . its way easier to get plugins nowadays and learn it impose to buying a vintage drum machine. either one is dope. old hardware does breakdown and cost to repair and its a mission finding disk for them. but i wouldnt suggest a maschine if u have alot of equipment already.
Yeah I understand that 1200's are a rare breed these days but fetishism of old gear sound is partially what I'm against, at least in reference to "modeling" them in Software. I'm not anti plugins or seeking a particular sound but something just feels superficial to me about using a plugin that instantly transforms your sound. It's kind of like instant Ramen. Sure it's tasty but because of those styrofoam cups I didn't learn how to cook until a couple of years ago. Any given plugin's the same, slap it on and bam stuff sounds nice but what did I learn about how to make my sound nice?
Damn, now I made myself hungry.
Kalaba wrote:true that Dollarlama,
But now that you've got Maschine and you work with it. How did it change your workflow? Like how did you generally build beats before and how would u say you create now? I'm talkin bout sequencing, recording fx that sort of stuff.
Because that's whats really concerns me at the moment about makin the move towards maschine.
dollarllama d wrote:Kalaba wrote:true that Dollarlama,
But now that you've got Maschine and you work with it. How did it change your workflow? Like how did you generally build beats before and how would u say you create now? I'm talkin bout sequencing, recording fx that sort of stuff.
Because that's whats really concerns me at the moment about makin the move towards maschine.
on each different hardware or software i try having a different approach. its quicker workflow because gettin actual filter effects on the mpc i would have run samples through the 303 or 404 then chop the sample. and also trackin out the beats on maschine is quicker which never was a fun task on any program.lol i wouldnt say its more complex if u know the mpc alot of the same rules apply. the sequencing was tricky at first because its kinda like ableton with the scenes . u can also resample like the 303 and 404 as well. because i would sequnce on the 303/404 by resampling. recordin live automated efx like filters and delays is easy only thing is automating mutes i dont think they have that yet. i use traktor for glitch efxs or 404 for that. whatever ur comfortable using . i just like switching up my process of approachin beats or it gets boring for me. its different for everyone. also another thing u should have alot of ram on ur comp. i had problems with maschine on my pc but i had reason on there as well. then when i got a mac it worked perfectly.
Kalaba wrote:dollarllama d wrote:Kalaba wrote:true that Dollarlama,
But now that you've got Maschine and you work with it. How did it change your workflow? Like how did you generally build beats before and how would u say you create now? I'm talkin bout sequencing, recording fx that sort of stuff.
Because that's whats really concerns me at the moment about makin the move towards maschine.
on each different hardware or software i try having a different approach. its quicker workflow because gettin actual filter effects on the mpc i would have run samples through the 303 or 404 then chop the sample. and also trackin out the beats on maschine is quicker which never was a fun task on any program.lol i wouldnt say its more complex if u know the mpc alot of the same rules apply. the sequencing was tricky at first because its kinda like ableton with the scenes . u can also resample like the 303 and 404 as well. because i would sequnce on the 303/404 by resampling. recordin live automated efx like filters and delays is easy only thing is automating mutes i dont think they have that yet. i use traktor for glitch efxs or 404 for that. whatever ur comfortable using . i just like switching up my process of approachin beats or it gets boring for me. its different for everyone. also another thing u should have alot of ram on ur comp. i had problems with maschine on my pc but i had reason on there as well. then when i got a mac it worked perfectly.
Oh thanks for the insight man. Now I see.. I thought you solely built your earlier beats on the 303/404. But if I'm correct you ran sounds through the SP into the MPC wow. So you basically used the SP as a unit to run your sounds through as an easy way to resample with fx/filters added?
Saw some nice Maschine vids.. still in doubt thought.