what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Moderator: TGN

jackschem
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:29 am

what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by jackschem »

i guess this is pretty self explanatory. what is either your favorite or most useful aspect of the 202?
lookin like a hot date
bangin like a "404"
jackschem
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:29 am

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by jackschem »

i am a huge fan of the pitch effect. like most of the 202 effects they are so bad they are awesome.
lookin like a hot date
bangin like a "404"
User avatar
shmedy
Member
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: New Mexico

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by shmedy »

pitch then filter1. no ?s asked. in fact thats what i use it for. ill pitch something, add the filter1, then throw it on the 555 or some shit.
User avatar
elhuana
Member
Posts: 1036
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Españada

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by elhuana »

I used it for applying low pass filter and for recording in standard quality ( which is acutally dope sounding lo-fi :) )

and yeah, the pitch effect was actually really good on 202
User avatar
modulr
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:40 am
Location: LA

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by modulr »

Everything is raw on the 202. Pitch and filter 1 are the tops, but I actually use the time stretch and delay to mangle too. The other cool thing is the pads remember what effects are applied (not counting pitch since it's global).
User avatar
elhuana
Member
Posts: 1036
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Españada

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by elhuana »

ModuLR wrote:The other cool thing is the pads remember what effects are applied (not counting pitch since it's global).

yeah, thats what struck me when I started playing with 202.

its so unbelievable that all the newcoming SPs have gained some new options and simultaneously lost others ( like this auto fx apply )... roland just dont get the meaning of the word "upgrade"...
User avatar
modulr
Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:40 am
Location: LA

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by modulr »

elhuana wrote:its so unbelievable that all the newcoming SPs have gained some new options and simultaneously lost others ( like this auto fx apply )... roland just dont get the meaning of the word "upgrade"...


yeah, I don't know what they're thinking... with each progression is a major throwback, they always manage to kill at least one feature I think is hella useful. Why can't it just be done in one simple machine... it's not like we're asking for anything complex... just improve on what they've already got. UPGRADE...lol.
jackschem
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:29 am

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by jackschem »

yeah, i guess the gritty sound of the 202 alone is one of the greatest things about it. the filters slowly got worse (at least up to the 404) as they "upgraded". the ring mod on the 202 is pretty intense, almost to the point of being annoying, but i like how shitty sounding it is.
lookin like a hot date
bangin like a "404"
dinner-for-two
Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 1:34 am

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by dinner-for-two »

202 is also sick bc you can delete samples off of pads whilst still listening to the external source! ill to freestyle beats on while using the mark button to loop samples.
User avatar
boombapp28
Member
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Rdg, PA

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by boombapp28 »

Low-end filters
Disciple of the Boom Bap.
Anti-Swag: Substance over Style.
MadTrucker
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:57 am

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by MadTrucker »

What I like it taking a nice breakbeat loop, and then setting the delay to the center point and wiggling it slightly to create a sort of Questlove-ish approach to a drum-n-bass pattern.

Also, using the ring modulator live to create a sort of guitar solo effect by continually mashing the start point of the sample while making little modulations to the pitch.

Lastly, I adore the realtime reverse and mark-point manual stutter that it permits in mid-sample, as opposed to the method on the new units where they force you to go to the beginning and end of the sample. I definately agree that Roland keep leaving things out and creating awkward work arounds on the new data formats. Oh well...
User avatar
ellaguru
Member
Posts: 7753
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: France-Italy

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by ellaguru »

boombapp28 wrote:Low-end filters

yes
the 202 got the best sp filters. for real.
9O2O2
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by 9O2O2 »

MadTrucker wrote:What I like it taking a nice breakbeat loop, and then setting the delay to the center point and wiggling it slightly to create a sort of Questlove-ish approach to a drum-n-bass pattern.


damn, i never would have thought of this. thanks for the tip

i almost let the 202 section go a month without a post!
User avatar
LORD BEATJITZU
Producer of the Year '09 + Tape of the Year '09 + 202 Award Winner '09
Posts: 550
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:25 am
Location: LAOS

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by LORD BEATJITZU »

Its all about the 202!
User avatar
lodger
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: what do you think is the most useful thing about the 202?

Post by lodger »

ModuLR wrote:
elhuana wrote:its so unbelievable that all the newcoming SPs have gained some new options and simultaneously lost others ( like this auto fx apply )... roland just dont get the meaning of the word "upgrade"...


yeah, I don't know what they're thinking... with each progression is a major throwback, they always manage to kill at least one feature I think is hella useful. Why can't it just be done in one simple machine... it's not like we're asking for anything complex... just improve on what they've already got. UPGRADE...lol.


honestly i think a big bit of it has to do with ignoring user feedback...and people being dumb enough to but iterations of products that aren't 100% what we want. C'mon...there has to be a way to even do simple pitch control on sp's (classic sampler style)
Post Reply