Missing features wishlist...

Talk the talk.

Moderator: TGN

User avatar
pt3r
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:23 am
Contact:

Post by pt3r »

Since it's xmas soon :-); my wishlist of features that could easily be added in a new os update but which we'll prolly never see unless som Roland JJ pops up:

I no particalr order.

1. A real copy function for samples and patterns alike
2. Resampling of a sequence (it could be that dsp power of the 404 is too low for this)
3. Panning on mono samples
4. 24 backups instead of 12
5. a proper pitchshift (12 semitones up and down)
6. being able to store bpm per pattern.
7. other time signatures than 4/4 while we're at it :-)
Kuraden
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 12:43 am
Contact:

Post by Kuraden »

More pads and smooth time & pitch shifting and I'm set for life
Housemaster
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:54 pm

Post by Housemaster »

A waveform screen. #2 would be the dopest as well
status: spoonfeeding nublet
current fav CD: Return to the 36 - ODB
User avatar
pt3r
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:23 am
Contact:

Post by pt3r »

Well actually I was only thinking about os upgrades, so I guess that extra pads and waveform display are a bit difficult :lol:. Waveform display is something I don't miss at all, I'm oldschool like that :-)
User avatar
blast1
Member
Posts: 664
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Daly City, CA

Post by blast1 »

a 404, cause i don't have one yet...
balazs
404 Award Winner '09 + Beat of the Year '09 + Tape of the Year '09
Posts: 2235
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:37 am
Location: New York

Post by balazs »

^ i would like to laugh at u , but i wont cuz karma is a bitch
User avatar
blast1
Member
Posts: 664
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:26 pm
Location: Daly City, CA

Post by blast1 »

juxt wrote:^ i would like to laugh at u , but i wont cuz karma is a bitch

haha! it's all good...
5_ELEMENT_NINJA
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:47 am

Post by 5_ELEMENT_NINJA »

pt3r wrote:Since it's xmas soon :-); my wishlist of features that could easily be added in a new os update but which we'll prolly never see unless som Roland JJ pops up:

I no particalr order.

1. A real copy function for samples and patterns alike
2. Resampling of a sequence (it could be that dsp power of the 404 is too low for this)
3. Panning on mono samples
4. 24 backups instead of 12
5. a proper pitchshift (12 semitones up and down)
6. being able to store bpm per pattern.
7. other time signatures than 4/4 while we're at it :-)

if we had all that i would use nothin but the 404 for life lol!
balazs
404 Award Winner '09 + Beat of the Year '09 + Tape of the Year '09
Posts: 2235
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:37 am
Location: New York

Post by balazs »

pt3r wrote:Since it's xmas soon :-); my wishlist of features that could easily be added in a new os update but which we'll prolly never see unless som Roland JJ pops up:

I no particalr order.

1. A real copy function for samples and patterns alike
2. Resampling of a sequence (it could be that dsp power of the 404 is too low for this)
3. Panning on mono samples
4. 24 backups instead of 12
5. a proper pitchshift (12 semitones up and down)
6. being able to store bpm per pattern.
7. other time signatures than 4/4 while we're at it :-)
soopa
Member
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:24 am
Location: long island

Post by soopa »

will it ever really happen? an OS update with all this? has anyone tried emailing Roland about this or something, they could probably make 10 bucks off this each person or something
balazs
404 Award Winner '09 + Beat of the Year '09 + Tape of the Year '09
Posts: 2235
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:37 am
Location: New York

Post by balazs »

i dont think roland would charge for an os update.
J.Daniels
Member
Posts: 268
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:40 am

Post by J.Daniels »

they havent charged for the other os updates. although none of them have had any significant changes..
Dj Frantic
Member
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:07 am
Location: Miami FL
Contact:

Post by Dj Frantic »

For me all it really needs is pattern copy and sample tuning/pitch
All the other stuff wouldnt hurt tho :) but to add to that id say add a hi pass filter effect also. Velocity sensitive pads would be nice. Like on the 606. Waveform displays are no fun ! Im glad akai dropped the mpc500...wich I used the other day and I hate it btw... workflow is terrible. But anyway... im glad they did because its out only hope of roland actually adding any kind of new significant features!
"Tellin my people we can flee to advantage but man is still a man and where he stands he'll leave damage" -Qwel

www.myspace.com/djfrantic
User avatar
pt3r
Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:23 am
Contact:

Post by pt3r »

@ Frantic while waiting for the pattern/sample copy, you can still you the 'flying lotus' method. (Woah almost sounds like kungfu doesn't it :lol:) Cause I wouldn't keep my hopes too high regarding an os upgrade from Roland.
Dj Frantic
Member
Posts: 1160
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:07 am
Location: Miami FL
Contact:

Post by Dj Frantic »

ya...im not. Roland sucks when it comes to hearing out thier customers :(
"Tellin my people we can flee to advantage but man is still a man and where he stands he'll leave damage" -Qwel

www.myspace.com/djfrantic
Post Reply