It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:35 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 555 or 606? tough question
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:30 pm 
Member

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 16
i saw some 606s on ebay for like $350 and im thinking of just breaking down and getting one instead of the 555. i love the 404 i have right now but it seems that the 606 is a little bit less geared towards live djing, and more on the production side, which i like. im looking to sample phrases of percussion etc., and play back via midi controller while playing drums. so in short, what is good or bad about the 606 in your opinion? is it worth the money? thanks.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:18 pm 
Member

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 16
also is it possible to trigger patterns(and individual samples) via midi controller??


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:40 pm 
505 Award Winner '09
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Posts: 1694
Location: montreal
i don't have the 606, but have the 505 (also have a 404).

i recommend you get the 606.

the 555 is in the same style as the 404, whereas the 606 offers something else.

the sequencer, screen-editing, etc. would complement the 404 you awready have, i'd argue, better than the 555.

my two cents.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:58 pm 
Most Helpful Member of the Year '09
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:13 am
Posts: 2797
Location: Netherlands
You can trigger samples vida midi controller and you can start pattern playback as well, but I haven't got any actual experience with midi and the 606 though.

Anyways, having owned both the 555 and 606, I'll give a short pro and con list.

Pro 606 -

- It has a screen! Yes, to me this mattered a lot, as it gives a good visual impression of what's going on.

- Surprisingly easy to work with.

- Has a good 4 track sequencer, even though it's limited. Song mode give a very nice way of making songs out of patterns.

- It has all the resampling and FX stuff you'll need.

- Great centerpiece sampler for in studio as it works great with most software packages out there, and even live it's great.

Con 606 :

- Less CF card memory to store samples on. (Not that it's a problem in practice as 512mb is a whole lot already and there's no shame in buying more 512mb cards. )

- At times it can be slow processing chops or loading samples. Nothing I really had issues with though as it's never a true pain waiting for a bit.

- Has less FX than the 555 if I recall correctly, but I actually like most of the FX the 606 and 555 have better on the 606.

- No DJFX or Loop Capture feature like the 555 has.



---

Pro 555:

- The Loop Capture function is great. DJFX Looper is cool, but familiar to 404 people.

- You'll get more FX (but still 3 at a time).

- It is a bit more geared towards live usage.

- CF cards are compatible up to 2 gigs. So it's a bit easier finding new cards. Having said that 2Gb and 4Gb are quickly becoming the minimum you'll find in stores these days, so you'll eventually run into the same problems as with the 606 here.

- It's great to jam with in a SP-404-style.

- It has a dedicated Mic input with phantom power. Some nice vocal amps and FX as well.

Con 555:

- Some people might be better of with a 606 because it has a screen, so you can see what's happening.

- A lot of stuff you'll do with the 555 will be by ear and mostly you will be using a combination of keys/knobs/pads to get things done. This won't be a problem for people used to a 404 as the 555 is quite similar in day to day usage, but I found the 555 to be more complex to handle than the 606.

- Loop Capture doesn't quite* work like a true Live looper like you will get with one of those looper pedals.

- The 1-track sequencer basically is very limited, but coming from a 404 you'll know all about that as well.


Having said all that, I would recommend the 606 to most people, but the 555 truly is a great machine as well. Perhaps I should have given it some more time learning as I can be impatient, but I felt like I was trying to operate a machine whilst being a bit blind. :)

_________________
"A man who misses his opportunity, and a monkey who misses his branch,
cannot be saved."

www.myspace.com/phemoxband
www.myspace.com/phemox
www.soundclick.com/phemox


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:39 pm 
303 Award Winner '09
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:01 am
Posts: 4586
Location: Narnia
Nice info Phemox, I would say the 606.

_________________
https://soundcloud.com/savedbythesmell
Image


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:00 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:35 am
Posts: 1202
Location: Blytheville, Arkansas.
I'm glad this topic is here. I was considering the 555 vs. the mpc 500 but now I'm thinking 606 over em both.

_________________
@ColeRockLee


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:03 pm 
505 Award Winner '09
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Posts: 1694
Location: montreal
hema - i fink you mentioned elsewhere something about 'not having the patience' for hardware or whatevs, so i gotta put that out there....

i donno about the 606, but the 505 processing is pretty slow.

maybe i'm mis-remembering what you said tho....

peace.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:13 am 
Member

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 16
i really wanted the 555 for loop capture just so that i could assign a redubbed pattern as a sample(since you cant trigger patterns with a midi controller) but saw that it was a little limited. i think that for my money my best bet is to get the 606 and use the 404 as a way to re-record patterns. i was thinking of selling the 404 but i keep thinking about the battery power option and on board mic... it is so fucking bad ass! im keepin it! thanks for the responses and advice! oh yeah... how does the start/end point marking work with 606, isnt a bit different? and how is the amp sim? thanks again.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:45 am 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:35 am
Posts: 1202
Location: Blytheville, Arkansas.
fauna wrote:
hema - i fink you mentioned elsewhere something about 'not having the patience' for hardware or whatevs, so i gotta put that out there....

i donno about the 606, but the 505 processing is pretty slow.

maybe i'm mis-remembering what you said tho....

peace.


Oh your dead on man. I was referring to the older shits that aren't fast with processing like the 404 and such. But, I'm really glad you brought that up. Any of you 606 got any comments on processing speed for things like resampling, saving, moving samples, etc?

_________________
@ColeRockLee


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:58 am 
Awesome Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 4:32 am
Posts: 914
Location: Agartha
I vote 606. If you already have a 404 the 555 seems kinda redundant. Then get one of those boss loop pedals and you're good to go. =)

_________________
innate knowledge is the foundation of all reality...


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:29 am 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:41 pm
Posts: 737
606 also has better I/O- balanced 1/4" stereo ins & outs + SPDIF digital in & out.

btw- it doesn't look like Roland is dropping any new samplers for winter NAMM.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 8:27 am 
Member

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:38 am
Posts: 46
Location: desert
606 aint really that slow, great machine. previous 303/404 users will feel spoiled


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 12:46 pm 
Most Helpful Member of the Year '09
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:13 am
Posts: 2797
Location: Netherlands
D. Port wrote:
606 aint really that slow, great machine. previous 303/404 users will feel spoiled


Yeah, the difference between the 555 and 606 isn't huge speed-wise. That shouldn't really be something for anyone to decide to not buy it, as it's never too slow.

I'm so hoping for a MC / SP Hybrid this Winter NAMM, but I don't think Roland will release one... yet. :wink:

_________________
"A man who misses his opportunity, and a monkey who misses his branch,
cannot be saved."

www.myspace.com/phemoxband
www.myspace.com/phemox
www.soundclick.com/phemox


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: