PAd Layering Or Track Layering? (Which Is Best?) NEED HELP!

Moderator: TGN

Post Reply
YoungHeat
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:36 pm
Contact:

PAd Layering Or Track Layering? (Which Is Best?) NEED HELP!

Post by YoungHeat »

Hey guys uumm I have a quick question what would be better for me to do....

I fI make a beat on the sp but I wanna layer different kicks, snares, hihats, or anything else what would be better Track Layering like putting the sounds on the same track or pad layering like putting the sounds on the same pads?

( I want to be able to pitch the sounds up and down I read a post stating that wasent possible when pad layering? Is it even possible at all to pictch shift w/o messing with the tempo and i it possible to change the tempo/speed of a sample without changing the pitch?)
I have Free Beats! Hit Me Up [email protected]

AIM: heatahustla
www.myspace.com/youngheat05

Image

Image
User avatar
Olby
MV Award Winner '09
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:58 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Olby »

If you are using any sampler from the Boss\Roland SP series you should forget about oldschool pitch shifting (changes both frequency and speed) although you can pitch shift samples without changing their tempos and timestretch (changing length the loop without affecting its pitch). But I must say that even on 606 and 505 quality of those both last effects is way worser than on any cheap computer software.

If only Roland would add original pitch shift feature like 16 PADS feature on MPC's 606 would become a bit of more rival to AKAI sampler series.
User avatar
606man
Member
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:28 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by 606man »

Yeah the only way to go is to use the computer really, at least the 606 has fluid computer connectivity!
BANGOUT
New member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:05 am

Post by BANGOUT »

u can layer on da pads
how?! :shock:
Post Reply