SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Moderator: TGN

User avatar
Danswift
Member
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:55 pm
Location: Out the back.Im digging up the yard and spying on the devil

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by Danswift »

^^^^

The Op1 Expansion Board isn't 'impossible to find'.

I sold two of those only pretty recently ..one of them to a member of this forum in fact.
User avatar
Girru
Member
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2022 12:08 am
Location: Margate, UK

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by Girru »

zindan wrote:
4 stereo tracks = 8 tracks dumb fuck

dunning-kruger effect on full display
Nah. 4 stereo tracks is 4 stereo tracks. 8 mono tracks, each pannable in the stereo field, and with the ability to record on them individually, is 8 tracks. I didn't use it for long enough to find out, lolz, but I'm betting you could only Balance each of the 4 tracks, not pan the 8 of them, and I know you def couldn't record on them individually...because they are forever linked in pairs.
Up yer bumz.
User avatar
zindan
Member
Posts: 1188
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:12 pm
Location: dallas

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by zindan »

Girru wrote:
zindan wrote:
4 stereo tracks = 8 tracks dumb fuck

dunning-kruger effect on full display
Nah. 4 stereo tracks is 4 stereo tracks. 8 mono tracks, each pannable in the stereo field, and with the ability to record on them individually, is 8 tracks. I didn't use it for long enough to find out, lolz, but I'm betting you could only Balance each of the 4 tracks, not pan the 8 of them, and I know you def couldn't record on them individually...because they are forever linked in pairs.
riiiight because you can't record two unique channels in a stereo recording and apparently the defining aspect of a multitrack recorder is the ability/lack of ability to pan tracks :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: the fact that you're even trying to excuse his stupidity here by flaunting your own is hilarious

"Professional remix-oriented phrase sampler/hard disk audio recorder with 8 tracks (4 stereo audio tracks) and 16 assignable sample pads per bank (64 banks total)" https://www.roland.com/us/products/sp-808/
http://www.soundcloud.com/zendanisdead
HAWTKARL wrote:The last thing we need is another utube sampling digital lo-fi anime beat maker.
IIIII wrote:he can turn water into a beat, and feed a thousand dancehalls with only two drumbreaks
User avatar
Girru
Member
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2022 12:08 am
Location: Margate, UK

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by Girru »

8 channel, 4 track.
Up yer bumz.
User avatar
TGN
Member
Posts: 490
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by TGN »

You can record 2 different mono signals to 1 stereo track and then use the "Center Canceler"-EFX to seperate them and bounce them individually to a track or pad.
SP-808 x SP-404 x SP-404mk2 x W30
http://www.thegreatnoire.bandcamp.com
User avatar
zindan
Member
Posts: 1188
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:12 pm
Location: dallas

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by zindan »

TGN wrote:You can record 2 different mono signals to 1 stereo track and then use the "Center Canceler"-EFX to seperate them and bounce them individually to a track or pad.
don't bother using logic and reason with someone who is claiming the manufacturers/developers/engineers of a certain product don't know what their own product is :lol: :lol: :lol: he already disagreed with roland themselves, so i don't think explaining simple concepts is going to be of any use with this one
http://www.soundcloud.com/zendanisdead
HAWTKARL wrote:The last thing we need is another utube sampling digital lo-fi anime beat maker.
IIIII wrote:he can turn water into a beat, and feed a thousand dancehalls with only two drumbreaks
User avatar
Girru
Member
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2022 12:08 am
Location: Margate, UK

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by Girru »

Aye, I bet that WORK AROUND is defo in the manual, lolz.
Up yer bumz.
User avatar
SP-USER
Member
Posts: 1170
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2020 10:00 am

Re: SP-404 FX Comparison // MK2 vs SX

Post by SP-USER »

I think you'll find it's a 4-Track, 8-Channel design, commonly referred to as "4 Stereo Tracks".

In professional audio, "Channel" is generally used when referring to Pan-related stuff, and "Track" is generally used when referring to recording tracks. This is why mixer specifications are generally described in terms of "channels", and multi-track audio recorders are generally described in terms of "tracks".

What Roland should have written in the specifications is simply "4 Stereo Tracks". Roland are quite messy at times with their literature, so messy in fact, that they actually undersell the MC-101 by refering to it as having "4 Tracks" instead of "4 Stereo Tracks".

I hope that helps to clear-up your confusion, Zindan :wink:
Post Reply