"Mastering" and the sp compressor

Moderator: TGN

Post Reply
saf90
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:09 am

"Mastering" and the sp compressor

Post by saf90 »

Yo, well I have a question regarding the sp's compressor (606/404sx). I like to compress some beats using mfx12, give them a nice, gritty feel. I was wondering if it was a good idea to do the "mastering" (in general tape sat + eq or dynamic eq to boost a bit the lows and mids) before bumping the beat to sp's compress or to do it after ? Or maybe it doesn't do any difference ?
Thanks in advance, and have some nice holidays
User avatar
THEGREAT
Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2017 5:47 pm

Re: "Mastering" and the sp compressor

Post by THEGREAT »

hi , yessir .. personally I'd do all processing (EQ etc) . Then the compressor last . the compressor is good .. you could use the compressor in a DAW for more control ( if you own a DAW also) I've not used the 404 compressor much myself
/ Krisso The Great /
Spotify Google Deezer Youtube
User avatar
Brutus Pivo
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 6:46 pm

Re: "Mastering" and the sp compressor

Post by Brutus Pivo »

saf90 wrote:I was wondering if it was a good idea to do the "mastering" (in general tape sat + eq or dynamic eq to boost a bit the lows and mids) before bumping the beat to sp's compress or to do it after ? Or maybe it doesn't do any difference ?
It makes a difference. I recommend EQing - compress - tape sat. My opinion, you could change the order how you want it. Just try different signal chains to hear the difference and decide which you like most.
Nice holidays, keep experimenting.
saf90
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:09 am

Re: "Mastering" and the sp compressor

Post by saf90 »

Thanks for the answers, going to try different process. I also just saw that it when cutting frequencies it was better to eq then compress (so the bad frequencies don't get compressed), whereas when boosting it's better to do it after
Post Reply