I've had the 2000, 2000xl and 1000. I like the Xl the best but yeah, it took too long to get something done. Loved the pads and for dropping drum loops they're shit hot. But I hate how long it takes to chop. Never named shit so that was never an issue. I really miss being able to modulate a samples sustain rate with velocity. You could get some crazy mad realistic hats with that!
What I don't like about MPC's
Moderator: TGN
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
Lol, I clicked on this thread thinking it would be a bunch of dudes dissing mpcs, but it seams cats are trying to diss you for hating on it
I've had the 2000, 2000xl and 1000. I like the Xl the best but yeah, it took too long to get something done. Loved the pads and for dropping drum loops they're shit hot. But I hate how long it takes to chop. Never named shit so that was never an issue. I really miss being able to modulate a samples sustain rate with velocity. You could get some crazy mad realistic hats with that!
I've had the 2000, 2000xl and 1000. I like the Xl the best but yeah, it took too long to get something done. Loved the pads and for dropping drum loops they're shit hot. But I hate how long it takes to chop. Never named shit so that was never an issue. I really miss being able to modulate a samples sustain rate with velocity. You could get some crazy mad realistic hats with that!
- Kei Kurono
- Member
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:32 pm
- Location: Los Angeles California
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
Unfolding I get what you're saying. I think it all comes down to preference. The reason why I chose my 555 over the 2000xl is because I've always liked experimental music. I love the effects and I love the fact that i can chop my samples quick and get very creative with it. With the mpc going through all those menus to load and chop samples made it feel more like work instead of just having fun and making music. The mpc does have great sequencing and quantization though. but yea I think it just comes down to what you're comfortable or like using. I would actually like to have one just for drums but for right now I'm good with the 555.
- Mr. Davenport
- Member
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:00 pm
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
preqwal wrote:Lol, I clicked on this thread thinking it would be a bunch of dudes dissing mpcs, but it seams cats are trying to diss you for hating on it![]()
I've had the 2000, 2000xl and 1000. I like the Xl the best but yeah, it took too long to get something done. Loved the pads and for dropping drum loops they're shit hot. But I hate how long it takes to chop. Never named shit so that was never an issue. I really miss being able to modulate a samples sustain rate with velocity. You could get some crazy mad realistic hats with that!
Thats just those two trolling to start a pissing contest. Ironically, they could just go over to the mpc forums if they are that bored.
- Mr. Davenport
- Member
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:00 pm
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
Kei Kurono wrote:Unfolding I get what you're saying. I think it all comes down to preference. The reason why I chose my 555 over the 2000xl is because I've always liked experimental music. I love the effects and I love the fact that i can chop my samples quick and get very creative with it. With the mpc going through all those menus to load and chop samples made it feel more like work instead of just having fun and making music. The mpc does have great sequencing and quantization though. but yea I think it just comes down to what you're comfortable or like using. I would actually like to have one just for drums but for right now I'm good with the 555.
That's pretty much how I feel about them too.
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
i like mpcs but at this point i'd rather just use a DAW for that type of workflow, faster and easier, and to me more fun. sps have that fun factor mpcs lack.
-
knobsmcgee
- Member
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:09 am
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
this is the most contemptuous thread ive ever seen on the Sp-forums.
Toraiz SP-16, SP-606, SP-505, Kaossilator KO2
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
No problems, your original post read like you saw a pic of the 606 & thought it was an MPC ripoff. Wasn't aware what gear you own/owned. Didn't mean to come across as bitter, sorry about that. Patronising's more my style. PeaceDorkus wrote:To answer your question, yes. I owned several mpc's since late 90's and have had the 606 for 8 years or so. I have used them both extensively together and seperate.
Spot on!Kei Kurono wrote:Unfolding I get what you're saying. I think it all comes down to preference.
- hseiken
- Winner of Silver Medal

- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:11 am
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
knobsmcgee wrote:this is the most contemptuous thread ive ever seen on the Sp-forums.
Obviously, you've not seen the responses to the kitchen spam threads.
- Ill Green
- Member
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:05 pm
- Location: LAWLESS MONSTER ZONE
- Contact:
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
The 606 is nothing like an MPC, more like the 505's distant brother. Only thing "MPC like" is the positioning of the 16 pads, mute groups, velocity pads and pattern chaining. Cock should be sucked for such blasphemy.

- Mr. Davenport
- Member
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:00 pm
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
If you look back and read carefully and at the same time quit taking yourself so damn seriously you will see I was talking about the wheel and navigating. For real some people take shit way to serious or just look for something to bitch about.
- Ill Green
- Member
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:05 pm
- Location: LAWLESS MONSTER ZONE
- Contact:
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
Dorkus wrote:If you look back and read carefully and at the same time quit taking yourself so damn seriously you will see I was talking about the wheel and navigating. For real some people take shit way to serious or just look for something to bitch about.
I'm just messing with ya. I don't have a mind for what others use, just what they bring out of it.
- Mr. Davenport
- Member
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:00 pm
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
Yeah it's cool that was a quick reply I didn't see the
My bad on jumping the defensive gun. I actually used nothing but the 606 for a few years. Another thing is when ya can have all them samples with the CF card I kinda go overboard on sample hoarding and never get around to using half of them. That what I like about the sp12 is you only have 5 seconds so it forces you to make due. The sound of them is what most people rave about but as an sp12 owner and former 1200 owner I can say I've heard roland sp beats that sound just as good in some cases better.
My bad on jumping the defensive gun. I actually used nothing but the 606 for a few years. Another thing is when ya can have all them samples with the CF card I kinda go overboard on sample hoarding and never get around to using half of them. That what I like about the sp12 is you only have 5 seconds so it forces you to make due. The sound of them is what most people rave about but as an sp12 owner and former 1200 owner I can say I've heard roland sp beats that sound just as good in some cases better.
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
... they are not a Boss product.
Zoom is second best.
ST-224, holler!
Zoom is second best.
ST-224, holler!
Latest sounds at Spotify
support my music habit, buying tapes @ mattcoops.bandcamp.com
Experiment, and Have Fun!
support my music habit, buying tapes @ mattcoops.bandcamp.com
Experiment, and Have Fun!
Re: What I don't like about MPC's
okay you dont like it...there are a lot of things i dont like about a lot of samplers...find what works for you.and make music..not topics

