It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:20 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: sound engine comparison 404 vs.505 is it the same ?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:33 pm 
Member

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:42 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Hartford
hi, first post here

i use a 404 to pull samples off of records and i transfer them via memory card onto my mac to chop in Recycle and work in Reason....

i love the 404, but im thinking that a 505 will be nice because it is small enough to travel with (like the 404) and i can also chop, compose and produce (unlike the 404).

so my question is would using the sp505 to pull samples to transfer onto my mac be the same quality as the 404 ?

thanks to all.

check my beats @:
www.myspace.com/lespasta


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 12:31 am 
Funniest Member of the Year '09

Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:06 am
Posts: 1877
hi , you can do all the things on the 404 as 505.

the 505 chop and pitch is almost useless.

the 404 has a different sound. but if you keep your levels cool you will get a cleaner sound. i would say the 505 sounds a little bit cleaner.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject: why do you say the chop and pitch is almost useless ?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:52 am 
Member

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:42 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Hartford
what kind of stuff are you wanting to use it for ? ive seen some editing demos that look pretty good.... please inform me thats why im here


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 5:44 pm 
505 Award Winner '09
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:26 pm
Posts: 1692
Location: montreal
i have the 505 and the 404.

if i understand correctly, the 505 has 20hrz output so it sounds dif from the 404. 505 also has the infamous 'long' sample setting which bit-crushes the sound a bit (making some sounds 'punchier' such as kicks).

i like the chop function, myself, and it sometimes gives me cuts i would not have thot of myself. use it often.

the pitch function is not great. but it is probably the best available in the sp- series (along w/ the 606). good enough for jazz as the saying goes.

the advantage the 505 offers is a 4-track sequencer, swing functionality, and a wav edit screen.

no idea which would be better if yr interfacing w/ yr DAW.

hope that helps!

_________________
D/L Hybrids & 5ive Packs, all SP-202, 404, and 505 beat tape:
http://faunaflage.bandcamp.com/album/hybrids-5ive-packs

post post post rock:
http://www.myspace.com/faunaflage | http://soundcloud.com/faunaflage


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 10:00 pm 
Member

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:48 pm
Posts: 270
Location: Canada
the 505 has the same engine that the 303 has,if I remember correctly.
Yes the 404,has a cleaner sound but from what I read,the ad/da convertors are of very good quality.
I do have both the 404 and the 505 and love them both.

_________________
http://www.myspace.com/robplatinuminc


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject: 505
PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:47 pm 
Member

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:42 pm
Posts: 261
Location: Hartford
i like my 404, although i dont really use it for production at all...

im not interfacing hardware with the computer ever, i switch between working with hardware and working with Reason, Recycle, Live...

if the 303 and 505 have the same sound engine and effects thats cool with me... ive heard a lot of tracks produced by madlib with just a 303 that sound nice...

ive owned two 202's and a 404... love all the roland/boss joints


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:30 pm 
Member

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:48 pm
Posts: 270
Location: Canada
same here,I use a bit of software but I do use hardware in a different setup.
Sorry,I forgot to mention that the AD/DA convertors that I was talking about,are the 505's.
I hear you about Madlib,when he first revealed that he was mainly using the 303 for his hiphop stuff,heads couldn't believe him!!

_________________
http://www.myspace.com/robplatinuminc


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:09 pm 
Member

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:53 pm
Posts: 799
Location: Home
damn man, i can't imagine not usin the box to cut, let alone produce, you really only use it for gettin samples and maybe then as an effects box for those samples before you export for your mac?? i'd try to get a little bit busier usin the box more, get a midi cable and sequence on your comp, but do all the choppin in the box, shit is so easy, the only time i've ever really been fully agitated to the point that i wanted to do somethin on the comp instead involved no chopping, its when i have a straight loop in a sequence and it is obviously a BPM between 2 whole numbers, it never sounds right to me, but the shit that i chop and sequence on the sp i always feel good about, thats what its made for


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:00 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:07 am
Posts: 1160
Location: Miami FL
The 505 has bit more of an old school sound. It has the same sound as the 303. Its bit smoother and a little more lofi. The difference is in the converters. I actually loved the pitch bank on the 505... that feature alone made it very hard to give up. It doesnt work good on loops and things its mainly for single notes and stuff but its very good for making basslines or getting a guitar or piano note or something it and making an octave out of it. I definitely like the 404 more overall though. The load times on the 505 are pretty long and I dont like editing with a wheel and screen. I prefer the 404s approach.

_________________
"Tellin my people we can flee to advantage but man is still a man and where he stands he'll leave damage" -Qwel

www.myspace.com/djfrantic


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 7752
Location: France-Italy
Quote:
the pitch function is not great. but it is probably the best available in the sp- series (along w/ the 606).



...the sp-606 don't have a pitch function. if yes, i never sow it (and i look for it hardly)...i heard that his pitch shift fx crapy-don't-wanted-thing could be "correct" and compressed with the Master function...

8)


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: