sorry no videos of the rc-50...
things i didn't liked about the rc-50:
-the pedals / a pain to use without shoes; way to small, only plastic, weird response -> makes it harder to get clean loops
- the unit itself is as big as a microkorg / no batterie support
- as i said the rc50 required a lot of foot action, i couldn't concentrate on, cause i got my hands busy on the decks... for example... to stop all loops you need to press 2 pedals (rc30- press stop pedal twice), if you want to record or stop on one of the 3 loops you need to assign it first then press rec or stop... (switching between the tracks on the rc30 can be done by holding the right pedal)
on the rc50 there is an extra for pedal for undo/redo, i still prefer the old way of holding down the pedal to undo. 6 pedals are just too much for me... I mean now the rc-30 is a 2-track and you control most things with the 2 pedals; very well programmed 'os' i think!
so are 200bugs more worth it for another track and midi?
-not for me; even if i love the 50's massive i/o's...
(each loop of the rc50 has an individual stereo-out)
so why do i prefer the rc30 over the rc50?!
-it's a really a great update to the rc-20xl (stereo!!!) and it's even cheaper then the rc-20 back in 2001. it's a turn-on-have-fun-machine! everything works like it's used to be and the 2-track took it to another level and the fx are really useful.
since the rc50 is out of stock i'm sure there is more to expect in the next years.
...oh and they switched from a 9V- batterie to 6x1,5V AA's...
undo/redo works only for the last recording, not for each loop...
to break it down the rc30 is less stressful then the rc50 when it comes to handling (no screen/menus either !!); i mean all these beatbox cats using it with their hands for a reason...
thanx boss!
