Again, I take my previous sample source length comments back! Loads ended up jumping on and we had a stella mix of tuneage! Very strong showing!

- Duh.jpg (46.01 KiB) Viewed 12258 times
Asha C - Got my vote, my fave overall track. Lovely stuff! ("Not my words, Michael; the words of Shakin' Stevens")
Lots of 'close seconds'...
lentilsoup - Listening to this again, I like it more and more each time. Seems like such a simple thing initially, but the way the samples and the delay repeats work together is amazeballs. Can't help but want to remix your remix with some BREAKZ!
TGN - Ggggggggggrrrrroooooooooooovvvvyyyy!
JayTreaze - HEAVY hip hop beat. TASTY!
Kel - Loved the pitch-shifted sample bizznezz - sounded like one of them omnichord things. Funky AF drumz and killer 'riffs'.
asha c wrote:My only criticism is that it took a long time to get there and would have loved to hear more of the beat throughout!
I agree! I did try a few different drum things for that bit but nothing stuck. I was wary of using timestretch on drums too much and dismissed doing so out of hand, but should've given it more of a go.
Despite all that, I was actually quite happy to have the beginining as a drumless section (it reminded me a bit of Godspeed You Black Emperor!, perhaps weirdly). But, yeah, that bit needed to be shorter, fo'sho'. I normally listen to a track a few times over a couple of days before saying it's finished and certain sections feeling too long is usually revealed to me then, so I can go back and edit. I rushed this track out a bit tho, and now I've listened to it a few times after the fact, yep, I'd defo cut a few patterns out.
I had that snare roll loop PERFECT but then accidently touched the wrong knob (oo-er, missus!) when in Time/BPM and couldn't get it back to how it was. WELL annoying! Comes in wrong now, lolz.
SP-USER wrote:TGN's track sounded superior in the production department but Run Of The Hind's track sounded superior in the musicality.
Yep, I agree it sounds like shit! Coz it was my first real time using a 303 as anything much more than a glorified effects box for other equipment, I didn't want to get bogged down with how things sounded and resampling and effects etc too much as I thought getting to grips with sampling, editing and sequencing was going to be headache enough. Just wanted to get through it!
Also, due to the unfortunate lack of individual outputs/sample panning on SPs, I couldn't do what I'd normally do for a track, i.e. stick a fuckload of cathedral reverb and fake tape echo over everything that's not drums to make it super spacey and mix/eq/treat that stuff and the drums separately. I couldn't do that being all-in 303 as the drums would've been reverbed/delayed as much as everything else, being on the same outputs***. Everything had to be 'mixed' in the sampler as I was going along which I'm not used to as I normally have individual outputs available.
My timing is slightly off too, with lots of 'pattern swap timing farts' between sections. I've since realised that I could've put empty bars at the end of my patterns to have prevented the farts this time. Live and learn!
That's one of the reasons I'm getting the MS-1 again - one voice polyphony on banks C/D/E and a mute group too, so I won't get that in future, as I'll be sampling my resampling-method-built 303 'patterns' onto individual MS-1 pads before recording those 'live', sans sequencer, from it into the VS880EX.
Thanks for my votes thus far! *blushes*
***I think I've figured out a solution for that in future, albeit a memory hungry one - sample in stereo and use centre canceller to pan, say, the drums, to the right when sampling them and pan whatever else to the left when sampling that. Then, when played back in a pattern/resampled sample together, one thing will come out of the left and t'other out of the right output, so can be treated differently in a mixer or whatever. Might not work tho. Haven't tried it yet...