Yeah but I'm worried I'll void Zindan's new 'Insanity-Free Guarantee' if I keep it upasha c wrote:HAHA im a lover not a fighter, anything that sparks civilised discussion is welcomed!
Bruh, I can't disregard a resource I don't need to readzindan wrote:here's another resource you will disregard https://www.musicgateway.com/blog/music ... io-formats
I don't doubt that what you're reading has been stated, but I'm afraid "Lossy" is not being used correctly in terms relative to the limits of human hearing. "Lossy" is only ever relative to (and the opposite of) "Lossless".
It's ironic really because although reduced bit-depth and sample rates are not the same as "Lossy", what they are the same as is "Lo-Fi", and after all, that is one of the reasons you love this stuff (it's due to it being "Lo-Fi" not "Lossy").