I don't get why the new roland products are missing the lo-f

LORD BEATJITZU · Post by **LORD BEATJITZU** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:18 am

yo DR>sample the pads on the 303 are way better IMO than the 404 pads!

Euclid Ov Oåklånd · Post by **Euclid Ov Oåklånd** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:19 am

That's what I thought. I know I like 'em a lot.

Hot Sauce · Post by **Hot Sauce** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:35 am

LORD BEATJITZU wrote:yo DR>sample the pads on the 303 are way better IMO than the 404 pads!

korg padKontrol here i come....

606man · Post by **606man** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:04 am

This bit's on the 404
That bit's on the 303
The 505 can do this
The 606 can do that

The 555 does some of the things that the others do and plenty that they don't.

Roland need to take a step forward with the SP series instead of always going backward/sideways - simply, don't take any features away when you release the next model - just add new ones to what's there!!!!!!

:idea:

Euclid Ov Oåklånd · Post by **Euclid Ov Oåklånd** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:54 am

Cosign that^. :idea:

mostblunted · Post by **mostblunted** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:54 am

Yo mike, are you sorta' working for roland?

Tell'em to integrate more sampling rates and maybe even bit depths.
Producers are waiting for that because the companies stopped doing that a long time ago. The only way to get that true old school sound is to really use lo-fi formats.

The LinnDrum2 will have different sample rates and bit depths when sampling....