It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 6:40 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Tascam DP02CF
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:37 am 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:38 am
Posts: 47
Hey all:

just wondering if anyone here is tracking out to the new Tascam DP02CF 8-track....

if so, is it any good?

I'm still using my old 414mkII 4-track cassette... I just can't get into the whole "all computer" approach, and I'm thinking of upgrading to the new DP02...

it only records at 16 bit 44.1... 24 bit is all the rage... does it really matter, though? isn't 16 bit good enough?

any feedback would be helpful, especially from someone who might own the DP...

thanks


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:43 am 
Member

Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:38 pm
Posts: 47
I own the DP02CF. Simple as hell, lots of inputs, even midi to sync your SP up with. I've never had a problem with 16 bit


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:46 am 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:07 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Wiscompton
By the way may add that those are some sexy porta studios. Compared to the last batch.

_________________
www.myspace.com/crthieljams
www.myspace.com/juptwo
"He kept diggin, an diggin, an now he gots more crates." - Showbiz & AG
"if hip hop is soooo soooo soooo diverse now why the fuck cant i find it?" - Niq Names


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:38 pm 
404 Award Winner '09 + Beat of the Year '09 + Tape of the Year '09
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:37 am
Posts: 2235
Location: New York
yeah, aint nothing wrong with 16 bit.

_________________
Image
Image

http://www.myspace.com/juxtkid


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:44 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:12 am
Posts: 1374
Location: tohoku, japan
Quote:
24 bit is all the rage...


it seems like these days its half that. everybody wants that "warm" 12 bit sound. actually i'm startin to think there is a lot more to it than bit ratio. tascam is solid, with a rep for high quality sound.

_________________
insert funny comment here.
http://soundcloud.com/jon-ill


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:15 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 12:31 am
Posts: 40
Location: Phoenix
I've been checking out the Tascam DP02CF lately also. It seems just about perfect - and for only $300!
I'm still using the 424mkIII. I love that bulky blue box - and I'll keep it,,, but I just might have to make room for the 8-track.
Recording to CF is pretty damn convenient also.


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:18 pm 
303 Award Winner '09
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:01 am
Posts: 4586
Location: Narnia
I'm going to buy one when I get my taxes.

_________________
https://soundcloud.com/savedbythesmell
Image


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:23 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:07 am
Posts: 1160
Location: Miami FL
bit depth has more to do with sound level than ne thing else. u can get a fuller recording with 24 bit...but it wont make ne difference at all since its gonna be bounced back to 16 bit for mp3 or cd any way. Some people say that u can notice a difference after if u used 24 bit... but I think they are just trying to rationalize on spending to much money 8)

_________________
"Tellin my people we can flee to advantage but man is still a man and where he stands he'll leave damage" -Qwel

www.myspace.com/djfrantic


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:36 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:07 am
Posts: 1160
Location: Miami FL
also, if u want to stay away from computers... I like the Zoom MRS-8 better than that tascam. Mainly because it has effects plus a mastering section that sounds good. So u can do your whole track on it. No usb...it would be nice if they gave u USB instead of that drum machine...owell... you can record back into the 404 and export .wav

_________________
"Tellin my people we can flee to advantage but man is still a man and where he stands he'll leave damage" -Qwel

www.myspace.com/djfrantic


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:59 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:35 am
Posts: 2289
Location: Berlin, Germany
Dj Frantic wrote:
but it wont make ne difference at all since its gonna be bounced back to 16 bit for mp3 or cd any way.


word

_________________
kill your darlings


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject: just bought one.
PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:15 pm 
New member

Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:05 pm
Posts: 1
Location: longview washington
im having a bitch of a time making it work.

the only way you can save the mastered song is to export it to a computer? if so what's the good of having the flash card?

i did a test recording. mixed it how i wanted to sound. did the master. now the only thing that it shows is the original recording. there is no two channel mastered mix.

what if i wanted to do several different songs, mix and master all of them. can i not save the mastered versions along with the originals until i feel like uploading them to my computer?

someone help me out here!


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 12:15 pm 
Most Helpful Member of the Year '09
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:13 am
Posts: 2797
Location: Netherlands
Dj Frantic wrote:
bit depth has more to do with sound level than ne thing else. u can get a fuller recording with 24 bit...but it wont make ne difference at all since its gonna be bounced back to 16 bit for mp3 or cd any way. Some people say that u can notice a difference after if u used 24 bit...


There is definitely a difference, but it's something hiphop producers usually aren't looking for anyways (hence the whole lo-fi stuff on their equipment.. :) ). If you compare mp3s with CDs or LPs the differences can really be heard, however for recording and playback 16bit is more than good enough. It will still give you the possibility to record into 192kb/s files which is more than enough for 'normal' usage anyways.

Quote:
but I think they are just trying to rationalize on spending to much money 8)


Definitely true too, and don't believe all the tales of salesmen or the commercials either. I mean sure there often ís a difference, but it's by far not as huge as they would have wanted it to be. :p

_________________
"A man who misses his opportunity, and a monkey who misses his branch,
cannot be saved."

www.myspace.com/phemoxband
www.myspace.com/phemox
www.soundclick.com/phemox


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 2:34 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:22 pm
Posts: 30
24-bit is important for processing in DAW. There you can get superior sound than 16-bit samples....of course you will need more powerful computer if u will playback for example 20 tracks in 24-bit

_________________
"Business is music, but music isn't business"
www.myspace.com/jazzyheadproduction


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 2:46 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 7:12 am
Posts: 1374
Location: tohoku, japan
24 bit is nice but actually i think the best is the 1-bit stuff that korg is using on their mr-1/mr-1000, seriously. i had a 1 bit sony cd player a few years ago. it was high-end but i got it for 15 bucks and some laborious tasks at a christian thrift store. my buddy has it now cuz i couldn't travel with it(heavy as mini-keg). that was the best sounding cd player i've ever heard; bar-none.

on the flip side i love me some raw sounding shiz. for at least another 3 or 4 years 16 bits is all anybody really needs.

_________________
insert funny comment here.
http://soundcloud.com/jon-ill


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:50 am 
Member

Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 8:24 am
Posts: 17
Now I forgot where I read this, but it still seems to make sense to me. If you bounce down from 24 bit to 16 bit you are actually WORSE off then if you started in 16 bit, because digital artifacts are added when converting. I'm far from an expert on this, so feel free to correct me if I'm way off. I'll try to find that article though.

_________________
'To understand and be understood is to be free.' Daniel Johnston 'Go'


Offline
 Profile  
Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: