There's nothing "lame" about avoiding Facebook bruh, and it is Facebook I am avoiding, not Chopperman's submission. I assure you I feel perfectly fine, confident and completely non-lame in my decision to not visit Cuntberg's Facebook!
Some of us have standards bruh, and things called 'ethics'.
Obviously I would love to have heard Chopperman's submission before placing my vote, but it is not happening. By making the decison to not visit Facebook, I can absolutely guarantee that posting on Facebook has left Chopperman at a disadvantage. This is because regardless of whether Chopperman were to win this battle, he is still potentally one vote down on what he might have been if he had not requested that people visit a website owned by Cuntberg.
There are ways and means of dealing with monsters like Facebook and its owner, and the one I just practiced would kill-off Facebook over night if everyone else had the decency to practice the same good ethics that I just practiced by refusing to visit the place.
I'm afraid your comment is typical of those who have been brain-washed into thinking and behaving exactly the way they want you to think and behave. No hate intended in this response, neither to you nor Chopperman, but you need to respect other people's decisions and not attack them for having good ethincs, because the fact of the matter is I could (and should) attack you both for having such stinking-bad ethics!
Instead I chose to handle the matter like the Gentleman with a conscience that I am.
I do not wish to continue this debate since this is a Beat Battle, and I will end it right now with a quote I am especially fond of and it is this ...
"You are young, you are foolish, and you will learn." ...
