SP-FORUMS

Man, artefacts are always artefacts, it's always a bad thing. You can not acclaim artefacts as something wanted - if so, it's really bad, amateurish attitude. Please don't understand it as offense, it's just how things works. Sometimes you can get some new sond from dirty stuff, but I guess this is ...

I have tried same loop with soft sequencer Acid, it get better timestretch results with same loop. I am sorry about sp606, because I get it and I have expected little better results with complete loops.

I guess 606 is made for triggering samples and loops at liveact. Sequencing, multi-samples or ...

I have tried both importing WAV file as well as importing EXT SEQ SAMPLING, with basic same results.

Maybe I just expect too much?

606man, please get my sample:

m

(900kB file) and hear it. It's basic loop at 140 BPM, second part is -5 BPM, thirth part is +5 BPM. Please tell me if you ...

I have tried both importing WAV file as well as importing EXT SEQ SAMPLING, with basic same results.

Maybe I just expect too much?

606man, please get my sample:

m

(900kB file) and hear it. It's basic loop at 140 BPM, second part is -5 BPM, thirth part is +5 BPM. Please tell me if you ...

I am not using that P606 mickey-mouse-program. I have exact loops from my software sequencer, which I made Acid-ized at SoundForge. It basicaly does not relay on Acidized stuff, if you setup tempo right manually, you should be OK as well.

Yesteday I have upgraded OS from 1.05 to 1.09 and it fixed ...

606man, are you 100% this is working? I am working with this timestretching, but there is LOTS of noises and artefacts as soon as I change BPM more that 3 BPM from original sample's tempo. Even on short, 1 measure sample with 140BPM original speed.

For me it looks, ehm sounds like this ...